Before
Limited Visibility The change review (including impact analysis) and approval processes are ad-hoc and manual.
Organizations with CABs do not have consistent information to work with.
Management reacts to change decisions, rather than evaluate the decision in the context of the impact.
Inconsistency Uncommon processes across groups causes isolation.
CABs review and approve changes in isolation and differently than other CABs
Limited Process The hand-off between incident/problem management and application development is often manual and vaguely defined.
Some CABs have a manual process for coordinating the hand-off between incidents and development.
|
After
Traceability Common change control processes in TeamTrack enable stabilization, control and fulfillment of audit requirements (e.g. FDA regulations).
CABs (Change Advisory Boards) using TeamTrack are more efficient and streamline the review/approval times.
Change approval processes in TeamTrack enable organizations to maintain traceability from the initial request to released code.
Consistent Change Approvals With common processes automated in TeamTrack, wider adoption, process definition and process streamlining are possible.
Project managers, CAB members and other TeamTrack users can adapt to other teams quicker with consistent processes in place.
Better Coordination and Process Improvement Coordinated change approval processes in TeamTrack synchronize the hand-off between the service desk and application development so activities are defined, automated and traceable.
The flexibility of TeamTrack enables organizations to adhere to their best practices for reviewing and approving change, streamlining the CABs workload.
|